The Team Layer

The Team Effectiveness Audit

"How does this team actually work together — and where does it break?"

Most team tools tell you the team is 'not aligned' and leave you there. This one shows you exactly which stage of team health is holding you back, and which kind of work your team has no one to carry — in the same 5D architecture behind everything else.

Why it matters

A team that can't be honest is a cost you're already paying

Most executive teams don't fail on strategy — they fail on the conversations they avoid, the decisions no one truly commits to, and the roles no one is energised to carry. That friction is expensive long before anyone names it: it shows up as slow decisions, quiet turnover, and initiatives that stall in the last 10%. The Team Effectiveness Audit makes the invisible visible, so you can fix the constraint instead of working around it.

The cost of not knowing

  • Decisions that get re-litigated in hallways because commitment was never real
  • High performers quietly carrying underperformers — until they leave
  • Work that stalls in a phase no one on the team is energised to own

What knowing gives you

  • The fix-first constraint named — so you work the bottleneck, not the symptom
  • Every blank in the energy grid made visible before it stalls the next initiative
  • One honest, shared map the whole team can act on together

The method

Not another assessment. A process that creates change.

"Most assessments end at the debrief. This one starts there."

THE METHOD1Context2Calibrated read3Triangulate4Your model5ActionONE ARCHITECTURE · FOUR ALTITUDESBeingWho the leader isDoingHow the leader behavesTeamHow the team worksSystemWhat the organisation is
01

Start with context

We begin with what you're actually navigating — the decision, the pressure, the moment — not a score in a vacuum.

02

A calibrated read

An objective, benchmarked measure of how leadership shows up under real conditions — not a self-perception snapshot.

03

Triangulate the view

Your self-rating meets multiple informant views, so the picture converges on reality instead of resting on one opinion.

04

In your language

Scored against Stuart's 5D model — one architecture across leader, team, and organisation — not a generic off-the-shelf list.

05

End in action

Every report resolves into prioritised, routed next moves and a re-measure loop — so the insight drives change, not a drawer.

One architecture, four altitudes

The Assessment Suite

Being → Doing → Team → System. Four assessments, one continuous architecture, all grounded in the 5D Leadership Architecture.

What it measures

A two-layer model

LAYER 1 — TEAM HEALTH ARCDISCOVERFoundational TrustDESIRECandid ChallengeDEFINEShared CommitmentDELIVERMutual Accountabi…DRIVEShared SuccessLAYER 2 — TEAM ENERGY GRIDDESIGNRadarArchitectEMBEDCatalystBuilderSCALEAnchor

Can this team function? The five stages of team health, built on the 5D model — each one rests on the one before it.

DISCOVER01

Foundational Trust

Can people be real — admit mistakes, ask for help — without it being used against them?

DESIRE02

Candid Challenge

Do you have the real debate in the room, or the polite version followed by hallway conversations?

DEFINE03

Shared Commitment

When you leave a decision, does everyone actually know — and own — what was decided?

DELIVER04

Mutual Accountability

Do peers hold each other to the line, or does everything have to route through the leader?

DRIVE05

Shared Success

Does the team put the collective result ahead of ego — and grow the people around it?

Who it's for

Built for leaders who are done with generic

1

Executive and senior leadership teams that look high-performing but stall on the things that matter

2

New leaders inheriting a team and needing an honest map of its dynamics, fast

3

Teams post-restructure or post-merger where trust and roles have quietly shifted

What you get

A report that actually lands

Team Health Arc profile

All five stages scored, with the earliest weak stage flagged as the fix-first constraint — because everything above rests on it.

Energy coverage map

Where your team is strong, thin, or blank across Design·Embed·Scale — the 'this is why work stalls here' view.

Perception gap

Where the leader's view of the team and the team's lived reality diverge — the blind spots that matter most.

Routed next moves

Development steps tied back to the 5D pillars and coaching library — not generic tips.

The evidence

Objective assessment is the highest-ROI development method there is

Grounded in Stuart Andrews' 25 years of practice and his book The Leadership Shift, and backed by DDI's Global Leadership Forecast 2025, the largest leadership study of its kind.

54%

of companies report strong ROI from objective leadership assessments — outpacing every other development method.

DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2025
1.8×

more likely to be a top-10% financial performer when assessment is paired with coaching.

DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2025
55%

of top financial performers use assessments — versus 46% of organisations overall.

DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2025

Proof, not promises

How you'll know it worked

This isn't a one-off snapshot. Re-run the audit after an intervention and the numbers move — or they don't, and you adjust. The self-vs-team perception gap is the sharpest early signal: when it narrows, trust and candour are genuinely improving, not just being talked about.

Signals to track

  • The weakest health stage lifts on re-assessment 6–12 months later
  • The self-vs-team perception gap narrows — leaders and teams converge on reality
  • Blank cells in the energy grid get covered as roles are rebalanced or hired for

How this is different

Not another off-the-shelf assessment

Typical assessment
This suite
Vs a single-pyramid team model
One linear ladder of behaviours to climb
Two layers — Team Health Arc and Team Energy Grid — on the 5D model
Where it starts
A generic competency list, same for everyone
Stuart's 5D model — one architecture across leader, team, and organisation
What you get back
A score and a bar chart
A designed, benchmarked report with a routed development path
After the result
A PDF that gets filed away
A live dashboard, a coaching-ready debrief, and a re-measure loop
The evidence
Vendor claims
25 years of practice (The Leadership Shift) + DDI research, read against a live benchmark

How it works

Three steps to the truth

1

Each member rates the team

The leader self-rates; the team rates the same statements. 60 behavioural, executive-grade items — no filler.

2

The two layers are scored

Health Arc + Energy Grid, with self-vs-team perception gaps computed automatically.

3

The team gets its map

A designed report + live dashboard showing exactly where to intervene first.

Frequently asked questions

See how your team really works

Add the Team Effectiveness Audit to your organisation's assessment suite.